Tuesday, February 24, 2009

One cellphone per child?

Qualcomm founder Irwin Jacobs wants smartphones in the classroom, and after school, to help make kids smarter.

By Stephanie N. Mehta, assistant managing editor
February 23, 2009: 12:53 PM ET


NEW YORK (Fortune) -- More than two decades ago, Qualcomm co-founder Irwin Jacobs introduced the world to a new technology standard for cellphones. Now Jacobs hopes to make cell phones standard equipment in the world's classrooms.

Jacobs, who is chairman of the wireless technology company, recently spoke to Fortune about a Qualcomm-funded pilot program that put smartphones in four North Carolina high schools. "Over the years I've thought about smart phones for education," Jacobs says.
But Jacobs admits he mostly focused on using the devices to teach in the classroom; the students in the pilot program, he reports, found the phones most valuable for after-school collaboration with teachers and classmates.


"It turns out the most valuable aspect was the social networking," he says.
"They were able to interact with one another, ask questions about homework, figure out solutions."


The pilot, dubbed Project K-Nect, last year provided math students with basic HTC smartphones with limits on the people with whom the students could communicate. Using materials developed by Drexel University and Florida State University, teachers incorporated the devices into their lesson plans.

They also encouraged students to use the phones to help solve problems after school, much the way students might use computers to assist in homework.

Jacobs, who obviously has a strong personal and professional interest in promoting the use of mobile devices, maintains that cellphones are superior to computers, especially the bare-bones machines designed for classrooms in low-income and emerging markets.

"Cell phones are much more reliable and have a lot lower support costs," says Jacobs. He notes that wireless broadband connections are available om much of the U.S., making it easy for students to download rich applications and even surf the web via phones. And in markets outside the U.S., most students will only access the Net via cellphone.

Of course, not everyone agrees with Jacobs' vision of a cellphone for every student. "Texting, ringing, vibrating," Janet Bass, a spokeswoman for the American Federation of Teachers, recently told The New York Times.

"Cellphones so far haven't been an educational tool. They've been a distraction."
But the use of cell phones in education also is gaining some unexpected supporters. A recent study titled "Pockets of Potential" concluded: "While concerns about health and safety must be addressed, a new emphasis on the potential of digital media to aid learning, especially for low-income children, is overdue." The author? A research fellow at the Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.


And teachers involved in the Qualcomm-backed project are believers, too.
Suzette Kliewer, a math teacher at Southwest High School in Jacksonville, N.C., said she saw average algebra students move into honors geometry classes in part because of the leg up the smartphones gave them. She said students used the phones to record videos of their peers explaining concepts, which not only added to their problem-solving abilities, but gave them confidence presenting information, too.


"Kids are not sitting around taking pictures or texts," says Kliewer. "This project has been very beneficial to these kids."

Cell phones in the classroom won't be an easy sell, but Qualcomm's Jacobs has overcome skeptics before: When he introduced the CDMA wireless technology (short for Code division multiple access) wireless industry insiders doubted its viability, arguing that the world didn't need another digital wireless standard. (Much of the rest of the world embraced the dominant global standard, GSM.)

Still Jacobs convinced a handful of operators, including Verizon Wireless and Sprint, to adopt CDMA, and Qualcomm's intellectual property is part of so-called 3G or third generation, broadband services deployed by most all carriers, including operators that use the GSM standard. If Jacobs could get the wireless industry to accept CDMA, he should be able to convince school districts to give cell phones a try.



When I first read this article I found it to be a very interesting concept. People don't usually consider cellphone use a "normal" activity that takes place in a high school classroom. Speaking from personal experience, I feel that being able to have technology at your disposal within the classroom is something that is truly beneficial. Going to a school when they provide every student with a laptop has been a great advantage. But there is also a downside, which usually comes from the faculty perspective. It's true that not every student uses their laptop for taking notes and it can be distracting. So what is stopping these kids from being distracted by using a cellphone? They make a valid argument within the article itself, but when reading, it seems like there is also great potential for students to utilize smart phones within the classroom. Because this trend is so new, it's hard to say if it will be able to stick and become more common place. We live in a society where technology is forever changing, growing and expanding what we are able to do. Who knows, maybe the use of smart phones and handheld devices will become common place within the classroom one day.

-Kyle

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Baby-faced boy Alfie Patten is father at 13

BOY dad Alfie Patten yesterday admitted he does not know how much nappies cost — but said: “I think it’s a lot.”

Baby-faced Alfie, who is 13 but looks more like eight, became a father four days ago when his girlfriend Chantelle Steadman gave birth to 7lb 3oz Maisie Roxanne. He told how he and Chantelle, 15, decided against an abortion after discovering she was pregnant. The shy lad, whose voice has not yet broken, said: “I thought it would be good to have a baby. “I didn’t think about how we would afford it. I don’t really get pocket money. My dad sometimes gives me £10.”

Little family ... Alfie, Chantelle and baby Maisie

Little family ... Alfie, Chantelle and baby Maisie

Lee Thompson

Alfie, who is just 4ft tall, added: “When my mum found out, I thought I was going to get in trouble. We wanted to have the baby but were worried how people would react.“I didn’t know what it would be like to be a dad. I will be good, though, and care for it.”Alfie's story, broken exclusively by The Sun today has sparked a huge political storm with Tory leader David Cameron saying: "When I saw these pictures this morning, I just thought how worrying that in Britain today children are having children."I hope that somehow these children grow up into responsible parents but the truth is parenthood is just not something they should be thinking about right now."

Secret

PM Gordon Brown refused to comment directly on the story but said it was important that the Government did all it could to prevent teenage pregnancies. Alfie’s dad Dennis yesterday told how the lad does not really understand the enormity of his situation — but seemed desperate to be a devoted and responsible father. He wanted to be the first to hold Maisie after the hospital birth. He tenderly kisses the baby and gives her a bottle. And Dennis, 45, said: “He could have shrugged his shoulders and sat at home on his Playstation. But he has been at the hospital every day.” Maisie was conceived after Chantelle and Alfie — just 12 at the time — had a single night of unprotected sex. They found out about the baby when Chantelle was 12 weeks pregnant. But they kept it a secret until six weeks later when Chantelle’s mum Penny, 38, became suspicious about her weight gain and confronted her. After that Alfie’s family told only those closest to them for fear he would be “demonised” at school. Chantelle gave birth to Maisie on Monday night after a five-hour labour at Eastbourne Hospital, East Sussex. Last night she told The Sun: “I’m tired after the birth. I was nervous after going into labour but otherwise I was quite excited.

Chantelle told how she discovered she was expecting after going to her GP with “really bad” stomach pains. She said: “Me and Alfie went. The doctor asked me whether we had sex. I said yes and he said I should do a pregnancy test. He did the test and said I was pregnant. I started crying and didn’t know what to do. “He said I should tell my mum but I was too scared. “We didn’t think we would need help from our parents. You don’t really think about that when you find out you are pregnant. You just think your parents will kill you.” But Penny figured out what was going on after buying Chantelle a T-shirt which revealed her swelling tum. Chantelle admitted she and Alfie — who are both being supported by their parents — would be accused of being grossly irresponsible. She said: “We know we made a mistake but I wouldn’t change it now. We will be good loving parents. “I have started a church course and I am going to do work experience helping other young mums. “I’ll be a great mum and Alfie will be a great dad.”

Caring ... Alfie bottle feeds his little daughter

Caring ... Alfie bottle feeds his little daughter

Chantelle and Maisie were released from hospital yesterday. They are living with Penny, Chantelle’s jobless dad Steve, 43, and her five brothers in a rented council house in Eastbourne. The family live on benefits. Alfie, who lives on an estate across town with mum Nicola, 43, spends most of his time at the Steadmans’ house. He is allowed to stay overnight and even has a school uniform there so he can go straight to his classes in the morning. Alfie’s dad, who is separated from Nicola, believes the lad is scared deep down. He said: “Everyone is telling him things and it’s going round in his head. It hasn’t really dawned on him. He hasn’t got a clue of what the baby means and can’t explain how he feels. All he knows is mum and dad will help. “When you mention money his eyes look away. And she is reliant on her mum and dad. It’s crazy. They have no idea what lies ahead.”

Dennis, who works for a vehicle recovery firm, described Alfie as “a typical 13-year-old boy”.

He said: “He loves computer games, boxing and Manchester United.” Dennis, who has fathered nine kids, told how he was “gobsmacked” when he discovered Alfie was to be a dad, too.

He said: “When I spoke to him he started crying. He said it was the first time he’d had sex, that he didn’t know what he was doing and of the complications that could come.“I will talk to him again and it will be the birds and the bees talk. Some may say it’s too late but he needs to understand so there is not another baby.”

Lovely

Chantelle’s mum said: “I told her it was lovely to have the baby but I wish it was in different circumstances. We have five children already so it’s a big financial responsibility. But we are a family and will pull together and get through. “She’s my daughter. I love her and she will want for nothing.” Last night Michaela Aston, of the anti-abortion Christian charity LIFE, said: “We commend these teenagers for their courage in bringing their child into the world. “At the same time this is symptomatic of the over-sexualisation of our youngsters and shows the policy of value-free sex education just isn’t working.” Today Sussex Police and the local council's children services said they have investigated the case and pledged continued support for the young parents. Britain’s youngest known father is Sean Stewart. He became a dad at 12 when the girl next door, 15-year-old Emma Webster, gave birth in Sharnbrook, Bedford, in 1998. They split six months later.

What are these parents teaching their children where they are having sexual relationships at the age of 12? Clearly not enough. Do school systems need to start sex education courses in the 5th and 6th grade? This 13 year old boy looks incredibly young. I mean when he is graduating high school he will have a 6 year old daughter probably in the same school system as himself!
There are now reports that little Alfie may not be the father of Maisie. Apparently seven other boys have come out and said that they have had sex with Chantelle. Chantelle says she lost her virginity to Alfie and has been with no one else. Alfie has agreed to a DNA test to prove he is the father. Some reports are saying they are just trying to cash in on the media. With a jobless father and five brothers all living on benefits this might not sound like a bad idea to a pregnant 14 year old.
Father or not, it is clear that these “children” have no idea what they are in for. They are not even old enough to take care of themselves let alone a baby. It appears, at least through the media, that kids these days are think it is cool to have babies. Example: The 17 girls in Gloucester that made a pact to all get pregnant no matter what it took. The media is so focused on celebrities having babies, especially when they are young and unmarried (Jamie Lynn Spears). High school girls see their role models having babies in their teens and want to do it too. So how do we break this view of premarital pregnancy? I think it comes down to good parenting and teaching your kids strong morals. Or at least teach them to wear a condom!

-Laura

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Does this look like the face of a monkey that would brutally maul you?

STAMFORD, Conn. – Travis the chimpanzee, a veteran of TV commercials, was the constant companion of a lonely Connecticut widow who fed him steak, lobster and ice cream. He could eat at the table, drink wine from a stemmed glass, use the toilet, and dress and bathe himself.

He brushed his teeth with a Water Pik, logged on to a computer to look at photos and channel-surfed television with the remote control.

But on Monday, the wild animal in him came out with a vengeance.

The 200-pound animal viciously mauled a friend of his owner before being shot to death by police.

Police said they are looking into the possibility of criminal charges. A pet owner can be held criminally responsible if he or she knew or should have known that an animal was a danger to others.

Police said that Travis was agitated earlier Monday and that Herold had given him the anti-anxiety drug Xanax in some tea. Police said the drug had not been prescribed for the 14-year-old chimp.

In humans, Xanax can cause memory loss, lack of coordination, reduced sex drive and other side effects. It can also lead to aggression in people who were unstable to begin with, said Dr. Emil Coccaro, chief of psychiatry at the University of Chicago Medical Center.

"Xanax could have made him worse," if human studies are any indication, Coccaro said.


This is absolutely insane...what the hell is a lady doing with a 200 pound pet monkey. I don't care how cute he is, or how he ate at the table with her and probably wiped his mouth with a napkin, nobody should have a giant pet monkey as a pets. Simple fact. Especially some old lady who cant control is monkey rage. I'm sure there has to be some law out there about keeping monkeys as pets. And how come none of her neighbors called animal control when she was driving around in her car and instead of a human in the passenger seat she has a 200 pound monkey. Didn't anyone think this lady might be a little unstable?

To top it off the crazy monkey lady gave the thing prescription drugs. Why are you giving your monkey Xanax for? If you know the thing is crazy maybe he shouldn't be your pet monkey anymore. This isn't Friends and that monkey ain't Marcel in that picture up there and he sure doesn't sit on your shoulder. The woman should be held responsible for her unbelievable negligence. If you search out the article and read a little more about Travis the monkey had actually caused problems in the past and animal control had to be brought in.

So then the question needs to be asked, why did she still have possession of the monkey? If animal control had awareness of the animal in her possession shouldn't they have done something about it? Again, there is no way it is legal to have a monkey living in your house in Connecticut. But hey if it is, I'm sure that will be changing soon since Travis ruined one woman's life.

Danny



Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Super Bowl Porn

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSpLAHGLnxU

Comcast Offers $10 Credit After Super Bowl Porn Blunder

Operator's Tucson System Continues to Investigate Possible 'Malicious Act'

By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News, 2/2/2009 7:14:25 PM MT

Comcast is offering a $10 credit to Tucson, Ariz., subscribers "impacted" by a 30-second porn clip that interrupted the local NBC affiliate's Super Bowl XLIII broadcast Sunday.
The clip from Shorteez, a hard-core pay-per-view adult channel owned by Playboy Enterprises, appeared in the standard-definition feed of
KVOA-TV on Comcast's local system in the game's fourth quarter immediately after the Arizona Cardinals scored to take a 23-20 lead with less than three minutes to go in the game. The HD version was unaffected.

The 30-second clip showed full-frontal male nudity, the Tucson Citizen reported. A second clip, which also aired during the telecast, showed about 10 seconds of end credits for Club Jenna, another Playboy-owned adult pay-per-view channel, according to the newspaper.

"We can't undo what happened, but we remain deeply sorry for the impact this situation has had on our customers," Comcast Tucson corporate affairs manager Kelle Maslyn said in a statement Monday. "To that end, we will be issuing a $10 credit to any Comcast video customer in Tucson who was impacted. While this credit won't change what happened, we hope that it will demonstrate to our customers, and to the Tucson community, how seriously we are taking this situation."



Talk about a wardrobe malfunction, the viewers in Tuscon, AZ area got treated to quite a show during the broadcast of the Superbowl. And I'm not talking about the Boss' sliding crotch shot during the half time show. This was a bit more Full Monty. Now I am all for a good practical joke and i have no complaints about seeing skin ( the Janet incident was really not a big deal ). But showing small children giant penis' is just plain wrong. There is no way around it, this was a sick and twisted thing to do.

I'm sure someone thought they were very funny for pulling the stunt off, but there are million other things you could have snuck in there. Maybe "Scarlet Takes a Tumble, http://http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8EnaLn-OlU, anything but what was shown. Whoever did this needs to step back and think about maybe their little sister, or young daughter seeing such a thing. Also take a look at how you find enjoyment in life, prob some issues you need to work out buddy.

Perhaps the worst part is Comcast's reaction to the incident. They're gonna give everyone ten bucks, big freaking deal. "You scar my five year old daughter, but hey no biggie cuz now I got ten bucks. Which I'm gonna give right back to you for the $150 dollar bill that came in the mail yesterday. Thanks Comcast"

You would think a giant corporation such as Comcast could possible give out some free cable for a month or at least something better than 10 bucks, it's really an insult. I'm sure someone will try and sue for mental distress or something. And because of such a crappy response to this truly strange and weird incident I hope they win.

Danny